GENERAL ELECTIONS IN ISRAEL

NO CHANGE FOR THE BETTER
Palestina Resisteix press release on March 29th '06

Palestina Resisteix has followed with great attention the election process, outcome and aftermath in the State of Israel.

It is our duty to lay a stress on a series on fundamental aspects that have mostly gone unnoticed in the general media.

One such observation is to question the legitimacy of such a vote when the Palestinian refugees expelled in 1948 and 1967 are denied to exercise their right of return enshrined in international law and express their views as to the affairs of their home country. Other Palestinians who do live inside the Israeli borders in "unrecognised" villages are also denied their citizen rights.

Furthermore the electoral outcome and allotment of seats in the Knesset parliament are not of so great relevance as long as the real powers and large part of the Israeli opinion strongly agree on keeping and expanding the Jewish settlements in the West Bank, upholding the pressure on the Palestinian National Authority so as not to make concessions and discrimination against the 20% of Palestinian citizenship inside Israel.

Many voices have welcomed the  success of Kadima party as a victory for moderation. This is looking over the fact that this party is formed with breakaways from right-wing Likud and Labour party who fully back the aforementioned consensus and leaders such as Tzipi Livni and Shaul Mofaz who have supported the most extremist policies in the past. 

The breakthrough of Israel Beitenu party who openly advocates ethnic cleansing is a sad confirmation of recent opinion polls which point at a growing racist tendency among Jewish Israelis. This paves the way for even more hardline action. There is a serious  risk that Israel might endeavour to apply mass deportations if the conflict should worsen.

The Palestinian National Authority and winning party Hamas have had to face a strong international pressure to force them to recognise the legitimacy of the State of Israel and to renounce the armed struggle. It would be fair to see such a pressure on the state of Israel who denies the Palestinian's basic rights and stands in constant defiance of international lawfulness. 

None of the parties who will form a government in Israel show any sign in their programme that they will renounce Zionism, terrorism and the aggressive policy that have been characteristic of all Israeli governments. In such a context only a decided commitment from the international community will make it possible to contend the conflict.

* * *